CFPB: ‘Unanticipated’ Overdraft Fee Can Count as an Unfair Act or Practice
The CFPB has issued a circular that addresses overdraft fees, particularly those that are unanticipated by consumers. The circular explains that overdraft fees, as described in the circular, can constitute unfair acts or practices.
According to CFPB, overdraft fees must comply with such rules as Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and Regulation Z, and the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA) and Regulation E – as well as the prohibition against unfair, deceptive, and abusive acts or practices (UDAAP), as defined under the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA).
However, the agency wrote, fees assessed by banks that a consumer “would not reasonably anticipate are likely unfair.” The agency said that such unanticipated overdraft fees “are likely to impose substantial injury on consumers that they cannot reasonably avoid and that is not outweighed by countervailing benefits to consumers or competition.”
“Unanticipated overdraft fees may arise in a variety of circumstances,” the bureau wrote. “For example, financial institutions risk charging overdraft fees that consumers would not reasonably anticipate when the transaction incurs a fee even though the account had a sufficient available balance at the time the financial institution authorized the payment – sometimes referred to as ‘authorize positive, settle negative (APSN)’).”
The circular includes a table displaying unanticipated overdraft fees assessed through ASPN with intervening debit transactions. It includes another table exhibiting unanticipated overdraft fees assessed through ASPN by a financial institution using “available balance for fee decision.”
The Association’s Advocacy Committee will be discussion this issue at its meeting this week as credit unions seek more clarity.
Join Our Mailing List
Keep up with the latest industry info, advocacy updates, member spotlights and upcoming events.